<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your Subscribers Use SpamArrest &#8211; Good or Bad?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moneyclicking.net/index.php/archives/2006/04/14/your-subscribers-use-spamarrest-good-or-bad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moneyclicking.net/index.php/archives/2006/04/14/your-subscribers-use-spamarrest-good-or-bad/</link>
	<description>Web Building for Internet Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:30:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://moneyclicking.net/index.php/archives/2006/04/14/your-subscribers-use-spamarrest-good-or-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-3281</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyclicking.net/index.php/archives/2006/04/14/your-subscribers-use-spamarrest-good-or-bad/#comment-3281</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a handy hack:

If you do your opt-ins via email, you don&#039;t have to worry about Spam Arrest since anyone who their users send email to is automatically added to that users whitelist. 

To subscribe, they send an email to list@domain.com, then when you send out your mailing from list@domain.com, it goes right through!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a handy hack:</p>
<p>If you do your opt-ins via email, you don&#8217;t have to worry about Spam Arrest since anyone who their users send email to is automatically added to that users whitelist. </p>
<p>To subscribe, they send an email to <a href="mailto:list@domain.com">list@domain.com</a>, then when you send out your mailing from <a href="mailto:list@domain.com">list@domain.com</a>, it goes right through!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JS</title>
		<link>http://moneyclicking.net/index.php/archives/2006/04/14/your-subscribers-use-spamarrest-good-or-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-2939</link>
		<dc:creator>JS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 17:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyclicking.net/index.php/archives/2006/04/14/your-subscribers-use-spamarrest-good-or-bad/#comment-2939</guid>
		<description>I would also read the TOS for SpamArrest...

You can be held liable finacially ($$$) if SpamArrest/end user so chooses for any future emails.  It&#039;s in the fine print which no one ever reads.  I&#039;ve never heard of SpamArrest pressing the issue but I wouldn&#039;t want to be the first one to pay the fine ;-)

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would also read the TOS for SpamArrest&#8230;</p>
<p>You can be held liable finacially ($$$) if SpamArrest/end user so chooses for any future emails.  It&#8217;s in the fine print which no one ever reads.  I&#8217;ve never heard of SpamArrest pressing the issue but I wouldn&#8217;t want to be the first one to pay the fine ;-)</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juan Pablo</title>
		<link>http://moneyclicking.net/index.php/archives/2006/04/14/your-subscribers-use-spamarrest-good-or-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-2893</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan Pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 12:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyclicking.net/index.php/archives/2006/04/14/your-subscribers-use-spamarrest-good-or-bad/#comment-2893</guid>
		<description>Hi,
  Although I like your fresh perspective on this topic, in practice SpamArrest, poses real problems:

  1. It takes your time to do the validation. (This means it is costing you money).
  2. The customer has signaled that they *want* to receive your emails. A second confirmation is another chance that you can loose this contact. 
  3. For a small list, it may be possible to do the verification, but for a bigger list, it will be an overkill.

At the begining I was doing the same as you suggest, and I was manually giving my details to the SpamArrest system. 
Given the number of cases where even after validation, the email was already declined by the customer, I don&#039;t bother any longer.


Regards,
JP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
  Although I like your fresh perspective on this topic, in practice SpamArrest, poses real problems:</p>
<p>  1. It takes your time to do the validation. (This means it is costing you money).<br />
  2. The customer has signaled that they *want* to receive your emails. A second confirmation is another chance that you can loose this contact.<br />
  3. For a small list, it may be possible to do the verification, but for a bigger list, it will be an overkill.</p>
<p>At the begining I was doing the same as you suggest, and I was manually giving my details to the SpamArrest system.<br />
Given the number of cases where even after validation, the email was already declined by the customer, I don&#8217;t bother any longer.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
JP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gobala Krishnan</title>
		<link>http://moneyclicking.net/index.php/archives/2006/04/14/your-subscribers-use-spamarrest-good-or-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-2890</link>
		<dc:creator>Gobala Krishnan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyclicking.net/index.php/archives/2006/04/14/your-subscribers-use-spamarrest-good-or-bad/#comment-2890</guid>
		<description>The way I see it, with every Spam Arrest request you comply with, you&#039;re guaranteed a subscriber. The email will never go to the junk folder again..

Then again if you have subscribers in the tens of thousands, I guess it can be irritating. But that&#039;s a &quot;good problem&quot; right :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way I see it, with every Spam Arrest request you comply with, you&#8217;re guaranteed a subscriber. The email will never go to the junk folder again..</p>
<p>Then again if you have subscribers in the tens of thousands, I guess it can be irritating. But that&#8217;s a &#8220;good problem&#8221; right :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

